Why Confusion Is the First Step Toward Insight
Charlotte Stone July 24, 2025
In the world of artificial intelligence, “hallucination” is more than a buzzword—it’s a phenomenon shaping how we think, learn, and even innovate. But here’s the twist: our confusion about these AI errors isn’t a bug. It might just be the beginning of our next big insight.
The Rising Concern: AI Hallucinations Are Everywhere
As AI systems like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude become more embedded in our daily lives, from search engines to coding assistants, the term “hallucination”—where AI confidently generates false or misleading information—has emerged as a significant issue. These blunders often cause confusion, especially when users trust AI-generated content blindly.
A 2023 study by Stanford University revealed that over 21% of AI responses in medical, legal, and academic domains contained hallucinations, often leading to serious misinformation (Zhao et al. 2023).
But here’s what’s fascinating: instead of viewing confusion as a setback, researchers and cognitive scientists are now saying it may actually trigger deeper learning.
Cognitive Science: Confusion Isn’t a Problem—It’s a Signal
Confusion is often seen as a negative emotion in education and tech, viewed as a barrier to understanding. However, research shows it plays a crucial role in fostering problem-solving and critical thinking. According to D’Mello and Graesser (2012), confusion can enhance learning outcomes when learners are motivated to resolve it (D’Mello and Graesser 2012). It activates the brain’s anterior cingulate cortex, which detects errors and monitors conflicts, priming the brain for deeper cognitive processing.
When an AI produces a confusing or misleading result, it triggers your brain to engage more actively. You start asking better questions, seeking clarification, and critically evaluating the information. This process not only resolves the confusion but also leads to a richer understanding of the topic. Embracing confusion as a signal of cognitive engagement, rather than a setback, can transform how we approach learning and interact with technology.
The AI Paradox: Mistakes That Make Us Smarter
Think of AI as your new Socrates—it poses flawed answers that force you to challenge assumptions.
When ChatGPT gives a slightly wrong math explanation, it prompts you to double-check the logic, sharpening your problem-solving skills. This mirrors the Socratic method, where questioning drives deeper understanding.
If Claude offers an incorrect historical fact, it can spark curiosity, leading you to explore primary sources and uncover richer context about the event.
Gemini’s hallucinated citations may push you toward original sources, honing your research skills and exposing you to authoritative works.
Rather than seeing AI hallucinations as flaws, some researchers suggest they can be tools for learning. Known as “productive failure,” this approach, used in education, promotes deeper understanding by working through errors (Kapur 2016). Designing AI to occasionally provoke confusion could encourage critical thinking, turning mistakes into opportunities for active learning and intellectual growth.
Design Thinking Meets Cognitive Dissonance
Modern UX and AI product designers are also tapping into this principle. By recognizing that “first-step confusion” often drives engagement and learning, they’re reshaping interfaces and tools to support exploration instead of spoon-feeding answers.
Companies like Duolingo and Khan Academy implement intentional difficulty and confusion points to force users into active retrieval and reasoning. This aligns with findings from neuroscience that struggling with a concept—even briefly—can significantly improve long-term retention (Bjork and Bjork 2011).
This phenomenon, known as “desirable difficulty,” represents a shift from traditional UX principles that emphasized reducing all friction. Cognitive science research reveals that strategic friction can actually benefit learning and memory formation by forcing deeper engagement.
The implementation takes various forms: progressive disclosure techniques that slowly reveal information, gamification elements that introduce controlled obstacles, and adaptive learning algorithms that maintain optimal challenge levels. Educational apps deliberately withhold immediate feedback, creating brief periods of uncertainty that encourage reflection. Similarly, productivity tools incorporate intentional friction points that lead to more thoughtful decision-making.
The key lies in calibrating the right amount of dissonance—enough to stimulate active thinking without overwhelming users. This creates what researchers call the “sweet spot of struggle” where cognitive load enhances rather than hinders the user experience.
So, when a chatbot stumbles, instead of being frustrated, consider this: the mistake might be the very friction your brain needs to grow. These moments of technological imperfection aren’t bugs to be eliminated but features that can enhance our cognitive development and problem-solving abilities.
Why This Matters in 2025
In today’s rapid tech cycle, being able to think critically is more important than ever. As AI increasingly supports research, writing, and even decision-making, our ability to recognize errors, sit with uncertainty, and investigate further becomes a vital skill.
- Journalists must vet AI-generated leads.
- Students need to separate AI-summarized sources from factual ones.
- Coders must debug AI-suggested snippets line by line.
In short, confusion isn’t just a momentary glitch. It’s the first step to becoming AI-literate.
From Confusion to Insight: A Simple Guide
Here’s how to leverage your confusion for insight in daily interactions with AI:
- Pause – Don’t accept AI output at face value.
- Question – What seems off or inconsistent?
- Cross-verify – Use at least two independent sources.
- Reflect – Why did the error occur? What concept needs clarification?
- Iterate – Ask again, refine your query, and test hypotheses.
This method turns each confusing moment into a micro-learning event—fueling growth.
Conclusion: Embrace the Discomfort
In an age where instant answers are just a prompt away, the ability to embrace confusion is becoming rare—and powerful. Hallucinating AIs may seem like flawed tools, but they might just be the catalysts that sharpen our minds.
As we venture deeper into AI-human collaboration, remember this: your confusion isn’t a flaw. It’s insight in disguise.
References
D’Mello, S. and Graesser, A. (2012) ‘Dynamics of affective states during complex learning’, Learning and Instruction, 22(2), pp. 145–157. https://doi.org
Zhao, W., Wallace, E., Feng, S., Klein, P., and Singh, S. (2023) ‘Evaluating factual consistency in language models’, Stanford Human-Centered AI. Available at: https://hai.stanford.edu
Kapur, M. (2016) ‘Examining productive failure, productive success, unproductive failure, and unproductive success in learning’, Educational Psychologist, 51(2), pp. 289–299. https://doi.org
Bjork, R.A. and Bjork, E.L. (2011) ‘Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way’, Psychology and the Real World, pp. 59–68. Available at: https://bjorklab.psych.ucla.edu
How to Use Internal Questions to Filter Content 
